Zakon o potvrđivanju sporazuma u skladu sa konvencijom ujedinjenih nacija o pravu mora o očuvanju i održivom korišćenju morske biološke raznovrsnosti područja izvan nacionalne jurisdikcije

Status propisa

Na snazi

Prikazana Verzija

Nema dostupnih verzija

Opšte Informacije

DonosilacNarodna skupština Republike Srbije

Zakon o potvrđivanju sporazuma u skladu sa konvencijom ujedinjenih nacija o pravu mora o očuvanju i održivom korišćenju morske biološke raznovrsnosti područja izvan nacionalne jurisdikcije

PART IVČl. Article 27–Article 39

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Article27

Objectives

The objectives of this Part are to:
a)
Operationalize the provisions of the Convention on environmental impact assessment for areas beyond national jurisdiction by establishing processes, thresholds and other requirements for conducting and reporting assessments by Parties;
b)
Ensure that activities covered by this Part are assessed and conducted to prevent, mitigate and manage significant adverse impacts for the purpose of protecting and preserving the marine environment;
c)
Support the consideration of cumulative impacts and impacts in areas within national jurisdiction;
d)
Provide for strategic environmental assessments;
e)
Achieve a coherent environmental impact assessment framework for activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction;
f)
Build and strengthen the capacity of Parties, particularly developing States Parties, in particular the least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, geographically disadvantaged States, small island developing States, coastal African States, archipelagic States and developing middle-income countries, to prepare, conduct and evaluate environmental impact assessments and strategic environmental assessments in support of the objectives of this Agreement.
Article28

Obligation to conduct environmental impact assessments

1. Parties shall ensure that the potential impacts on the marine environment of planned activities under their jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction are assessed as set out in this Part before they are authorized.
2. When a Party with jurisdiction or control over a planned activity that is to be conducted in marine areas within national jurisdiction determines that the activity may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment in areas beyond national jurisdiction, that Party shall ensure that an environmental impact assessment of such activity is conducted in accordance with this Part or that an environmental impact assessment is conducted under the Party’s national process. A Party conducting such an assessment under its national process shall:
a)
Make relevant information available through the Clearing-House Mechanism, in a timely manner, during the national process;
b)
Ensure that the activity is monitored in a manner consistent with the requirements of its national process;
c)
Ensure that environmental impact assessment reports and any relevant monitoring reports are made available through the Clearing-House Mechanism as set out in this Agreement.
3. Upon receiving the information referred to in above, the Scientific and Technical Body may provide comments to the Party with jurisdiction or control over the planned activity.
Article29

Relationship between this Agreement and environmental impact

assessment processes under relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies
1. Parties shall promote the use of environmental impact assessments and the adoption and implementation of the standards and/or guidelines developed under in relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies of which they are members.
2. The Conference of the Parties shall develop mechanisms under this Part for the Scientific and Technical Body to collaborate with relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies that regulate activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction or protect the marine environment.
3. When developing or updating standards or guidelines for the conduct of environmental impact assessments of activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction by Parties to this Agreement under , the Scientific and Technical Body shall, as appropriate, collaborate with relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies.
4. It is not necessary to conduct a screening or an environmental impact assessment of a planned activity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, provided that the Party with jurisdiction or control over the planned activity determines:
a)
That the potential impacts of the planned activity or category of activity have been assessed in accordance with the requirements of other relevant legal instruments or frameworks or by relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies;
b)
That:
i)
the assessment already undertaken for the planned activity is equivalent to the one required under this Part, and the results of the assessment are taken into account; or
ii)
the regulations or standards of the relevant legal instruments or frameworks or relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies arising from the assessment were designed to prevent, mitigate or manage potential impacts below the threshold for environmental impact assessments under this Part, and they have been complied with.
5. When an environmental impact assessment for a planned activity in areas beyond national jurisdiction has been conducted under a relevant legal instrument or framework or a relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral body, the Party concerned shall ensure that the environmental impact assessment report is published through the Clearing-House Mechanism.
6. Unless the planned activities that meet the criteria set out in
i)
above are subject to monitoring and review under a relevant legal instrument or framework or relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral body, Parties shall monitor and review the activities and ensure that the monitoring and review reports are published through the Clearing-House Mechanism.
Article30

Thresholds and factors for conducting environmental impact assessments

1. When a planned activity may have more than a minor or transitory effect on the marine environment, or the effects of the activity are unknown or poorly understood, the Party with jurisdiction or control of the activity shall conduct a screening of the activity under , using the factors set out in below, and:
a)
The screening shall be sufficiently detailed for the Party to assess whether it has reasonable grounds for believing that the planned activity may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment and shall include:
i)
A description of the planned activity, including its purpose, location, duration and intensity; and
ii)
An initial analysis of the potential impacts, including consideration of cumulative impacts and, as appropriate, alternatives to the planned activity;
b)
If it is determined on the basis of the screening that the Party has reasonable grounds for believing that the activity may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment, an environmental impact assessment shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Part.
2. When determining whether planned activities under their jurisdiction or control meet the threshold set out in above, Parties shall consider the following non- exhaustive factors:
a)
The type of and technology used for the activity and the manner in which it is to be conducted;
b)
The duration of the activity;
c)
The location of the activity;
d)
The characteristics and ecosystem of the location (including areas of particular ecological or biological significance or vulnerability);
e)
The potential impacts of the activity, including the potential cumulative impacts and the potential impacts in areas within national jurisdiction;
f)
The extent to which the effects of the activity are unknown or poorly understood;
g)
Other relevant ecological or biological criteria.
Article31

Process for environmental impact assessments

1. Parties shall ensure that the process for conducting an environmental impact assessment pursuant to this Part includes the following steps:
a)
Screening. Parties shall undertake screening, in a timely manner, to determine whether an environmental impact assessment is required in respect of a planned activity under its jurisdiction or control, in accordance with , and make its determination publicly available:
i)
If a Party determines that an environmental impact assessment is not required for a planned activity under its jurisdiction or control, it shall make relevant information, including under , publicly available through the Clearing-House Mechanism under this Agreement;
ii)
On the basis of the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, a Party may register its views on the potential impacts of a planned activity on which a determination has been made in accordance with subparagraph
a)
(i) above with the Party that made the determination and the Scientific and Technical Body, within 40 days of the publication thereof;
iii)
If the Party that registered its views expressed concerns on the potential impacts of a planned activity on which the determination was made, the Party that made that determination shall give consideration to such concerns and may review its determination;
iv)
Upon consideration of the concerns registered by a Party under subparagraph (a) (ii) above, the Scientific and Technical Body shall consider and may evaluate the potential impacts of the planned activity on the basis of the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and, as appropriate, may make recommendations to the Party that made the determination after giving that Party an opportunity to respond to the concerns registered and taking into account such response;
v)
The Party that made the determination under subparagraph (a) (i) above shall give consideration to any recommendations of the Scientific and Technical Body;
vi)
The registration of views and the recommendations of the Scientific and Technical Body shall be made publicly available, including through the Clearing- House Mechanism;
b)
Scoping. Parties shall ensure that key environmental and any associated impacts, such as economic, social, cultural and human health impacts, including potential cumulative impacts and impacts in areas within national jurisdiction, as well as alternatives to the planned activity, if any, to be included in the environmental impact assessments that shall be conducted under this Part, are identified. The scope shall be defined by using the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities;
c)
Impact assessment and evaluation. Parties shall ensure that the impacts of planned activities, including cumulative impacts and impacts in areas within national jurisdiction, are assessed and evaluated using the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities;
d)
Prevention, mitigation and management of potential adverse effects. Parties shall ensure that:
i)
Measures to prevent, mitigate and manage potential adverse effects of the planned activities under their jurisdiction or control are identified and analysed to avoid significant adverse impacts. Such measures may include the consideration of alternatives to the planned activity under their jurisdiction or control;
ii)
Where appropriate, these measures are incorporated into an environmental management plan;
e)
Parties shall ensure public notification and consultation in accordance with ;
f)
Parties shall ensure the preparation and publication of an environmental impact assessment report in accordance with .
2. Parties may conduct joint environmental impact assessments, in particular for planned activities under the jurisdiction or control of small island developing States.
3. A roster of experts shall be created under the Scientific and Technical Body. Parties with capacity constraints may request advice and assistance from those experts to conduct and evaluate screenings and environmental impact assessments for a planned activity under their jurisdiction or control. The experts cannot be appointed to another part of the environmental impact assessment process of the same activity. The Party that requested the advice and assistance shall ensure that such environmental impact assessments are submitted to it for review and decision- making.
Article32

Public notification and consultation

1. Parties shall ensure timely public notification of a planned activity, including by publication through the Clearing-House Mechanism and through the secretariat, and planned and effective time-bound opportunities, as far as practicable, for participation by all States, in particular adjacent coastal States and any other States adjacent to the activity when they are potentially most affected States, and stakeholders in the environmental impact assessment process. Notification and opportunities for participation, including through the submission of comments, shall take place throughout the environmental impact assessment process, as appropriate, including when identifying the scope of an environmental impact assessment under article 31, paragraph 1 (b), and when a draft environmental impact assessment report has been prepared under , before a decision is made as to whether to authorize the activity.
2. Potentially most affected States shall be determined by taking into account the nature and potential effects on the marine environment of the planned activity and shall include:
a)
Coastal States whose exercise of sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving or managing natural resources may reasonably be believed to be affected by the activity;
b)
States that carry out, in the area of the planned activity, human activities, including economic activities, that may reasonably be believed to be affected.
3. Stakeholders in this process include Indigenous Peoples and local communities with relevant traditional knowledge, relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies, civil society, the scientific community and the public.
4. Public notification and consultation shall, in accordance with , be inclusive and transparent, be conducted in a timely manner and be targeted and proactive when involving small island developing States.
5. Substantive comments received during the consultation process, including from adjacent coastal States and any other States adjacent to the planned activity when they are potentially most affected States, shall be considered and responded to or addressed by Parties. Parties shall give particular regard to comments concerning potential impacts in areas within national jurisdiction and provide written responses, as appropriate, specifically addressing such comments, including regarding any additional measures meant to address those potential impacts. Parties shall make public the comments received and the responses or descriptions of the manner in which they were addressed.
6. Where a planned activity affects areas of the high seas that are entirely surrounded by the exclusive economic zones of States, Parties shall:
a)
Undertake targeted and proactive consultations, including prior notification, with such surrounding States;
b)
Consider the views and comments of those surrounding States on the planned activity and provide written responses specifically addressing such views and comments and, as appropriate, revise the planned activity accordingly.
7. Parties shall ensure access to information related to the environmental impact assessment process under this Agreement. Notwithstanding this, Parties shall not be required to disclose confidential or proprietary information. The fact that confidential or proprietary information has been redacted shall be indicated in public documents.
Article33

Environmental impact assessment reports

1. Parties shall ensure the preparation of an environmental impact assessment report for any such assessment undertaken pursuant to this Part.
2. The environmental impact assessment report shall include, at a minimum, the following information: a description of the planned activity, including its location; a description of the results of the scoping exercise; a baseline assessment of the marine environment likely to be affected; a description of potential impacts, including potential cumulative impacts and any impacts in areas within national jurisdiction; a description of potential prevention, mitigation and management measures; a description of uncertainties and gaps in knowledge; information on the public consultation process; a description of the consideration of reasonable alternatives to the planned activity; a description of follow-up actions, including an environmental management plan; and a non-technical summary.
3. The Party shall make the draft environmental impact assessment report available through the Clearing-House Mechanism during the public consultation process, to provide an opportunity for the Scientific and Technical Body to consider and evaluate the report.
4. The Scientific and Technical Body, as appropriate and in a timely manner, may make comments to the Party on the draft environmental impact assessment report. The Party shall give consideration to any comments made by the Scientific and Technical Body.
5. Parties shall publish the reports of the environmental impact assessments, including through the Clearing-House Mechanism. The secretariat shall ensure that all Parties are notified in a timely manner when reports are published through the Clearing-House Mechanism.
6. Final environmental impact assessment reports shall be considered by the Scientific and Technical Body, on the basis of relevant practices, procedures and knowledge under this Agreement, for the purpose of developing guidelines, including the identification of best practices.
7. A selection of the published information used in the screening process to make decisions on whether to conduct an environmental impact assessment, in accordance with , shall be considered and reviewed by the Scientific and Technical Body, on the basis of relevant practices, procedures and knowledge under this Agreement, for the purpose of developing guidelines, including the identification of best practices.
Article34

Decision-making

1. A Party under whose jurisdiction or control a planned activity falls shall be responsible for determining if it may proceed.
2. When determining whether the planned activity may proceed under this Part, full account shall be taken of an environmental impact assessment conducted in accordance with this Part. A decision to authorize the planned activity under the jurisdiction or control of a Party shall only be made when, taking into account mitigation or management measures, the Party has determined that it has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the activity can be conducted in a manner consistent with the prevention of significant adverse impacts on the marine environment.
3. Decision documents shall clearly outline any conditions of approval related to mitigation measures and follow-up requirements. Decision documents shall be made public, including through the Clearing-House Mechanism.
4. At the request of a Party, the Conference of the Parties may provide advice and assistance to that Party when determining whether a planned activity under its jurisdiction or control may proceed.
Article35

Monitoring of impacts of authorized activities

Parties shall, by using the best available science and scientific information and, where available, the relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, keep under surveillance the impacts of any activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction that they permit or in which they engage in order to determine whether these activities are likely to pollute or have adverse impacts on the marine environment. In particular, each Party shall monitor the environmental and any associated impacts, such as economic, social, cultural and human health impacts, of an authorized activity under their jurisdiction or control in accordance with the conditions set out in the approval of the activity.
Article36

Reporting on impacts of authorized activities

1. Parties, whether acting individually or collectively, shall periodically report on the impacts of the authorized activity and the results of the monitoring required under .
2. Monitoring reports shall be made public, including through the Clearing- House Mechanism, and the Scientific and Technical Body may consider and evaluate the monitoring reports.
3. Monitoring reports shall be considered by the Scientific and Technical Body, on the basis of relevant practices, procedures and knowledge under this Agreement, for the purpose of developing guidelines on the monitoring of impacts of authorized activities, including the identification of best practices.
Article37

Review of authorized activities and their impacts

1. Parties shall ensure that the impacts of the authorized activity monitored pursuant to are reviewed.
2. Should the Party with jurisdiction or control over the activity identify significant adverse impacts that either were not foreseen in the environmental impact assessment, in nature or severity, or that arise from a breach of any of the conditions set out in the approval of the activity, the Party shall review its decision authorizing the activity, notify the Conference of the Parties, other Parties and the public, including through the Clearing-House Mechanism, and:
a)
Require that measures be proposed and implemented to prevent, mitigate and/or manage those impacts or take any other necessary action and/or halt the activity, as appropriate; and
b)
Evaluate, in a timely manner, any measures implemented or actions taken under subparagraph (a) above.
3. On the basis of the reports received under , the Scientific and Technical Body may notify the Party that authorized the activity if it considers that the activity may have significant adverse impacts that were either not foreseen in the environmental impact assessment or that arise from a breach of any conditions of approval of the authorized activity and, as appropriate, may make recommendations to the Party.
4. (a) On the basis of the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, a Party may register its concerns, with the Party that authorized the activity and with the Scientific and Technical Body, that the authorized activity may have significant adverse impacts that were either not foreseen in the environmental impact assessment, in nature or severity, or that arise from a breach of any conditions of approval of the authorized activity;
b)
The Party that authorized the activity shall give consideration to such concerns;
c)
Upon consideration of the concerns registered by a Party, the Scientific and Technical Body shall consider and may evaluate the matter based on the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and may notify the Party that authorized the activity, if it considers that such activity may have significant adverse impacts that were either not foreseen in the environmental impact assessment or that arise from a breach of any conditions of approval of the authorized activity and, after giving that Party an opportunity to respond to the concerns registered and taking into account such response and as appropriate, may make recommendations to the Party that authorized the activity;
d)
The registration of concerns, any notifications issued and any recommendations made by the Scientific and Technical Body shall be made publicly available, including through the Clearing-House Mechanism;
e)
The Party that authorized the activity shall give consideration to any notifications issued and any recommendations made by the Scientific and Technical Body.
5. All States, in particular adjacent coastal States and any other States adjacent to the activity when they are potentially most affected States, and stakeholders shall be kept informed through the Clearing-House Mechanism and may be consulted in the monitoring, reporting and review processes in respect of an activity authorized under this Agreement.
6. Parties shall publish, including through the Clearing-House Mechanism:
a)
Reports on the review of the impacts of the authorized activity;
b)
Decision documents, including a record of the reasons for the decision by the Party, when a Party has changed its decision authorizing the activity.
Article38

Standards and/or guidelines to be developed by the Scientific and

Technical Body related to environmental impact assessments
1. The Scientific and Technical Body shall develop standards or guidelines for consideration and adoption by the Conference of the Parties on:
a)
The determination of whether the thresholds for the conduct of a screening or an environmental impact assessment under have been met or exceeded for planned activities, including on the basis of the non-exhaustive factors set out in paragraph 2 of that article;
b)
The assessment of cumulative impacts in areas beyond national jurisdiction and how those impacts should be taken into account in the environmental impact assessment process;
c)
The assessment of impacts, in areas within national jurisdiction, of planned activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction and how those impacts should be taken into account in the environmental impact assessment process;
d)
The public notification and consultation process under , including the determination of what constitutes confidential or proprietary information;
e)
The required content of environmental impact assessment reports and published information used in the screening process pursuant to , including best practices;
f)
The monitoring of and reporting on the impacts of authorized activities as set out in , including the identification of best practices;
g)
The conduct of strategic environmental assessments.
2. The Scientific and Technical Body may also develop standards and guidelines for consideration and adoption by the Conference of the Parties, including on:
a)
An indicative non-exhaustive list of activities that require or do not require an environmental impact assessment, as well as any criteria related to those activities, which shall be periodically updated;
b)
The conduct of environmental impact assessments by Parties to this Agreement in areas identified as requiring protection or special attention.
3. Any standard shall be set out in an annex to this Agreement, in accordance with .
Article39

Strategic environmental assessments

1. Parties shall, individually or in cooperation with other Parties, consider conducting strategic environmental assessments for plans and programmes relating to activities under their jurisdiction or control, to be conducted in areas beyond national jurisdiction, in order to assess the potential effects of such plans or programmes, as well as of alternatives, on the marine environment.
2. The Conference of the Parties may conduct a strategic environmental assessment of an area or region to collate and synthesize the best available information about the area or region, assess current and potential future impacts and identify data gaps and research priorities.
3. When undertaking environmental impact assessments pursuant to this Part, Parties shall take into account the results of relevant strategic environmental assessments carried out under above, where available.
4. The Conference of the Parties shall develop guidance on the conduct of each category of strategic environmental assessment described in this article.